​

In late October 2017, the current president of the United States (whose name I will not befoul this website with), ordered the release of all remaining classified documents pertaining to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.

Those of us who are interested in this cold case were looking forward to this moment in the hopes of finding some new information.

I, as a born sceptic, knew in advance not to get my hopes up.

Alas I was right.

​

​

Well we saw this one coming a mile away, didn't we?

We, as researchers, have to sit back and watch the media sink deep into the quicksand trap that has been set before them.

​

News media grabbed this oppertunity to try and boost sales by sending their most mediocre reporters to get copies of whatever they could get their greedy little hands on, and make a legible story out of it.

Something the uninformed person would read and respond to with "Hey! See? I told you this, didn't I?"

​

The Daily Record, for one, opened their Saturday November 4th edition with:

New JFK files dismiss rumours of CIA link to assassin Lee Harvey Oswald as 'unfounded'

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/uk-world-news/new-jfk-files-dismiss-rumours-11465090

​

Several days before that they actually fell for the story regarding the Oswald visit to Mexico City, after finding information in a document that proves Oswald met Valeriy Kostikov.

​

Now I know how people look at us researchers as nutjobs who have nothing better to do with their spare time, but surely we do much better investigative work than these yuppies who spent several years getting a degree in journalism?

These youngsters have no opinion in the matter whatsoever, but just do as their editor instructs them.

Reporters never gave a damn about the truth, so why would a 54 year old murder case be any different?

Just because researchers still find it important to solve this case doesn't mean anyone else should. Right?

Wrong!

​

When I read the story they printed about the Kostikov meeting I was fairly furious. I contacted this newspaper in the hopes of getting some kind of explanation for their hasty print. Of course they did not have the respect to send a reply.

​

We rely on news media to inform us of events as they unfold, and to supply us with truthful information.

But how can we ever trust them when they do not understand the simplicity of the release of documents that tell nothing but lies?

How is it they fail to realize that the real information that proves Oswald's innocence of ever firing a rifle that day, or perhaps any documents that reveal the identities of his co-conspirators, will never see the light of day, and have probably already been destroyed?

How is it that a newspaper is able to fall for the bullshit disguised as "released CIA documents", and view these as actual fact?

Does no one in the news business understand that the United States government would only release documents that had no truth to them whatsoever? Because if suddenly documents were de-classified that told a completely different story than was released in the sixties that no one would ever believe them ever again?

Researchers saw this coming. Why couldn't journalists?

​

But it's worse than we thought; actual false information has been released. 

The same cover story they told the media to print back in 1963 has been thrown to the public in 2017, and the newspapers couldn't wait to jump on it and spread the same crap all over again. This time voluntarily. Because, let's face it; right now it's a hot topic.

The U.S. government got their way, and are laughing their asses off.

Ladies and gentlemen, it's the toupet's lasting joke.

​

​

​

​

​

​

​